Best/cheapest methods to get good looking image on a flat screen

I just recently upgraded to from a CRT to a flat screen. It's got VGA, Component and HDMI.

My main question is what are some good methods in getting accurate, good looking images to play your retro games on?



Example, I recently try in using this, it's an av/s-video to hdmi converter.



It's not really good, you actually get worst image with s-video than connected to the av spot and of course, you can notice a half a second delay on controls being pressed.

image

I'm now considering getting this IF the results would be any different.

image







What do you use for your flat screen tv? I just refuse to believe that a XRGB-mini is the only way to enjoy retro games like on an CRT, considering that little thing cost $400...


Comments

  • I'll just get an AVS next month.



    AVS: Change the way you play! ©
  • AVS. Just do it.
  • Xrgb mini really is amazing I put off getting one forever and I am glad I have one. AvS is awesome but the xrgb will work with more than one console. Price is crazy but it's worth it.



    I have used nes, snes, genesis, saturn, and turbografx on the xrgb mini
  • cheapest solution: get a tube tv with RGB/S-video.



    best all around solution: XRGB Mini (aka Framemeister)



    best NES solution will be the AVS from RetroUSB/Bunnyboy of course. Second best is AV Famicom RGB/S-video modded
  • A $30 crt is better than $1000 flat screen + $400 frameister.
  • Originally posted by: pegboy



    A $30 crt is better than $1000 flat screen + $400 frameister.



    Agreed. At least for older games, I don't want to use anything except a CRT. No lag.

  • Originally posted by: pegboy



    A $30 crt is better than $1000 flat screen + $400 frameister.



    QFT



    Newer isn't always better.
  • A friend of mine bought one of those cheapy Amazon guys and it wasn't that great; it added a little fuzziness to the image and didn't help too much with lag.



    Me, I know how you feel, since my living situation right now prevents me from being able to devote enough space to any CRT worth a shit. I myself bought an iScan VP30; it's not quite a Framemeister but it's much better than those Amazon guys and I only paid about $100 for it. It's got a lot of options, works really well for interlaced 3D systems like the N64, and the 2D support isn't bad either (and muuuuuuuch better than just plugging straight into an HDTV with a NES or whatever).



    I did a video review of the VP30 here if you're at all inclined: https://videotron2000.wordpress.com/2016/05/19/new-adventures-in-hi-def-iscan-vp30-video-upscaler-review/
  • Originally posted by: pegboy



    A $30 crt is better than $1000 flat screen + $400 frameister.





     I strongly disagree. RGB looks infinitely better than a CRT. Maybe I got lucky, but have virtually zero lag using the Framemeister on my RCA 42", which happens to be a cheap HDTV.
  • Originally posted by: Thunderblaze16



    I'm now considering getting this IF the results would be any different.

    image







    What do you use for your flat screen tv? I just refuse to believe that a XRGB-mini is the only way to enjoy retro games like on an CRT, considering that little thing cost $400...

     



    That cable won't work, it's meant for devices that use a single DE15 connector for audio/composite/s-video output. 



    There are other video processors than the Framemeister, I'd recommend taking a look at Fudoh's review page: http://retrogaming.hazard-city.de/



    Since your HDTV has VGA input, you might want to consider looking into older video processors that can be had for cheap on eBay. The cheapest, decent video processor I can recommend is the iScan Plus if you can get it under $30. It obviously won't make the picture look as good as the Framemeister, but it will properly recognize and convert 240p to 480p and you can attach a mini-SLG/SLG3000 to the VGA output for scanlines.

     
  • I absolutely agree CRT is the way to go...but finding a good quality one with S-video/composite hookups can be a bit tricky. Then again, we've had records make a comeback...who's to say CRT's won't as well?
  • Originally posted by: pegboy



    A $30 crt is better than $1000 flat screen + $400 frameister.



    A majority of the time, people that say this have not tried RGB + frameister.



    I personally would never go back to a CRT.

     
  • Originally posted by: scottmog

     
    Originally posted by: pegboy



    A $30 crt is better than $1000 flat screen + $400 frameister.



    A majority of the time, people that say this have not tried RGB + frameister.



    I personally would never go back to a CRT.

     





    I find myself going from RGB + frameister to my CRT with s-video all the time.  Just depends on what I am playing and I do think they both look great.  The crt makes me feel like I am playing in the 90s.  That being said the XRGB mini is amazing and blows away the cheap hdmi scaler.  I like having the option of both and I been seriously considering a PVM but the wife would probably not be happy lol.
  • Originally posted by: Estil



    I absolutely agree CRT is the way to go...but finding a good quality one with S-video/composite hookups can be a bit tricky. Then again, we've had records make a comeback...who's to say CRT's won't as well?

    Probably any state/country that has laws related to energy efficiency ratings like EnergyStar...    



     

  • Originally posted by: ginoscope




    Originally posted by: scottmog

     

    Originally posted by: pegboy



    A $30 crt is better than $1000 flat screen + $400 frameister.



    A majority of the time, people that say this have not tried RGB + frameister.



    I personally would never go back to a CRT.

     





    I find myself going from RGB + frameister to my CRT with s-video all the time.  Just depends on what I am playing and I do think they both look great.  The crt makes me feel like I am playing in the 90s.  That being said the XRGB mini is amazing and blows away the cheap hdmi scaler.  I like having the option of both and I been seriously considering a PVM but the wife would probably not be happy lol.



    Of course it's all subjective, but I prefer a CRT to a framemeister. RGB on a PVM is the best though. It's literally a perfect picture. 


  • Wow I want an AVS. First time reading about one. They do not seem to be available on the Retro USB web page.
  • Originally posted by: Estil

    Then again, we've had records make a comeback...who's to say CRT's won't as well?

    I'm to say.  



    Records never really went away, and they're fairly cheap for boutique companies to keep producing them.



    The only people that care about CRTs are retro gamers. CRTs require a major manufacturer who can 1) produce them in quantity and 2) handle the dangerous chemicals like mercury inside them. You're not going to get a boutique manufacturer capable of making them, nor are the big boys ever going back to making them.



     
  • Originally posted by: tbone3969



    Wow I want an AVS. First time reading about one. They do not seem to be available on the Retro USB web page.

    They're not ready to ship out yet. End of June is the tentative date for sale, but that's not set in stone (dependent upon the Chinese manufacturer.)



     
  • I'm reeeaally putting some thought into getting an avs. The cheapest solution I can think of to get retro games looking good on an HDTV is an emulation machine (raspberry pi, retron 5 etc)
  • Really, when talking picture quality, LCD has passed CRT a while ago. The problem is, the so-called 240p consoles use doesn't exist, it's 480i thats not following proper standards. And rather than make their TVs represent these devices properly, they do all sorts of weird shit to "improve" the picture, while adding delay and making the picture look like crap.



    On a normal 480i image, you have 30 frames per second. Each frame is two fields, like this

    11111111111 11111111111 33333333333 33333333333

    --------------- 22222222222 22222222222 44444444444

    11111111111 11111111111 33333333333 33333333333

    --------------- 22222222222 22222222222 44444444444

    11111111111 11111111111 33333333333 33333333333

    --------------- 22222222222 22222222222 44444444444





    When the image is drawn, it shows field 1 on lines 0, 2, 4, 6 ect. On the second half of the frame, it sets the field offset by one, so that it draws lines 1, 3, 5. In so called 240p, it never changes the offset field like it's supposed to, so you get this:



    11111111111 22222222222 3333333333 44444444444

    --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------

    11111111111 22222222222 3333333333 44444444444

    --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------

    11111111111 22222222222 3333333333 44444444444

    --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------



    Since LCDs are digital (As are a few CRTs!), they have logic built into them to figure out how to handle this. And different TVs process them different ways. There is no technical reason why they can't have scan lines. One of the most common ways is to ignore the offset setting, so it forces the bottom picture to look like the top one. Your non-standard "240p" image becomes standard 480i, because the TV "fixes" it. Some special effects, like if you're hit, will blink the sprite on/ff every frame. With this offset it really messes with this effect, where every other scan line just vanishes, while the remaining ones stay on steady, giving you a stripped effect when hit. Other TVs, however, do even stranger, more convoluted shit which makes this even worse.



    Another issue is scaling. 240p, when stretched to 1080, is a 4.5x stretch. So every 8 pixels, you repeat a line, which can have some ugly effects. It's best to scale it 4x and have borders on all sides, but the extra pixel lines generally happen on tile borders, so at least it's not as ugly as it could be, by default. If your panel is a native ???x1200 it looks soooo much better, but 1200 high panels are rare. Most 4K TVs using 2160 panels which is a nice even 9x of 240p, so this helps with a nice even picture.



    The biggest issue is many TVs use all sorts of dithering for their scaling, which looks much better with live action, and even with SOME games, but the bulk of 240p is just creates strange artifacts. Tie this with the flicker issues when you turn off a sprite every other frame, and you get some really ugly and weird issues.
  • Originally posted by: BertBerryCrunch



    I'm reeeaally putting some thought into getting an avs. The cheapest solution I can think of to get retro games looking good on an HDTV is an emulation machine (raspberry pi, retron 5 etc)

    Not only does the AVS give you HDMI and 720p, you get:



    Built in Four Score

    Built in Game Genie

    Built in Famicom adapter



    So if you subtract the cost of those separately, it puts the HDMI stuff in perspective.



     
  • Originally posted by: Tulpa

    Originally posted by: BertBerryCrunch



    I'm reeeaally putting some thought into getting an avs. The cheapest solution I can think of to get retro games looking good on an HDTV is an emulation machine (raspberry pi, retron 5 etc)

    Not only does the AVS give you HDMI and 720p, you get:



    Built in Four Score

    Built in Game Genie

    Built in Famicom adapter



    So if you subtract the cost of those separately, it puts the HDMI stuff in perspective.



     



    I haven't looked much into it yet, but I'm wondering if there'll still be lag because of the HDTV. That would be a deal breaker for me. Also I'm not even sure what the cost will be to get one   I'm sure the cost will be reasonable for what you get though
  • That's more on the TV than on the AVS, IMO. You get that issue coming up with "modern" consoles.
  • I see a lot of people hyping up the AVS, but it's not even out yet is it? As someone that is out of the loop on this, what am I missing?
  • Originally posted by: ZBomber



    I see a lot of people hyping up the AVS, but it's not even out yet is it? As someone that is out of the loop on this, what am I missing?

    Most of us have been anticipating it for YEARS.



    A few on the site have been lucky enough to help test the system and the scoreboard features.





    What you're missing:  turnkey HDMI NES, using all new hardware, with added features like "scoreboard"

    It's FPGA based, and Bunnyboy knows his stuff, unlike the makers of every shitty clone system in the last 30 years, so hopes are high with regard to quality and compatibility.



     
  • Originally posted by: arch_8ngel

     
    Originally posted by: ZBomber



    I see a lot of people hyping up the AVS, but it's not even out yet is it? As someone that is out of the loop on this, what am I missing?

    Most of us have been anticipating it for YEARS.



    A few on the site have been lucky enough to help test the system and the scoreboard features.





    What you're missing:  turnkey HDMI NES, using all new hardware, with added features like "scoreboard"

    It's FPGA based, and Bunnyboy knows his stuff, unlike the makers of every shitty clone system in the last 30 years, so hopes are high with regard to quality and compatibility.



     



    Got it, thanks! I was trying to figure out how this differentiated itself from the "HD" NES systems that have been flooding the market lately. The estimated price (from what I read in an article dated last month) certainly seems to be worth it.



    Is there any footage out there captured from an AVS?
  • Originally posted by: ZBomber

    Got it, thanks! I was trying to figure out how this differentiated itself from the "HD" NES systems that have been flooding the market lately. The estimated price (from what I read in an article dated last month) certainly seems to be worth it.



    Is there any footage out there captured from an AVS?

    Some are on Bunnyboy's channel.







    And Mog's channel.







    Go to the "everything else" forum and look for the thread "I have a dream..." Most of the AVS stuff is later in the thread. More than you would ever care to know. (And whatever you do, don't ask for the color pallete numbers.   )



    Most of the other HD NES solutions are mods or kit based, rather than a new dedicated console. You'd need an NES and someone to mod it.



     
  • Originally posted by: Tulpa



    Some are on Bunnyboy's channel.





    Go to the "everything else" forum and look for the thread "I have a dream..." Most of the AVS stuff is later in the thread. More than you would ever care to know. (And whatever you do, don't ask for the color pallete numbers.   )



    Most of the other HD NES solutions are mods or kit based, rather than a new dedicated console. You'd need an NES and someone to mod it.



     



    Those do look really sharp! Looks like I have a lot of reading ahead of me... and only a couple weeks to start saving up enough cash.  
  • Will say - after seeing a Framemeister in action... they are freaking gorgeous. No joke. Very pricey, but damn does it look sexy.
  • Originally posted by: ZBomber

    Those do look really sharp! Looks like I have a lot of reading ahead of me... and only a couple weeks to start saving up enough cash.  

    He also offers a limited edition AVS in a clear case, a wood storage box, and other goodies. Buy one of those ... so there are more of the standard ones for me.  



     
Sign In or Register to comment.