Copyright notice from Elite Systems Ltd. / Motivetime Ltd.

Just got an email from Elite Systems concerning one of their games in my selling threads. It looks pretty legit, it has me a bit concerned. I got in a panic and sent a reply offering to comply with their demands, no reply yet.



I haven't ever had anything like this happen. Does anyone know some details on Elite Systems?
«1

Comments

  • They're threatening legal action because you're trying to sell their game that you own?
  • It's an unreleased game of theirs.
  • What exactly are you selling?
  • Adventures of Dr. Franken. I have since erased all mention of it.
  • I can't imagine they'd bother to pursue this further or how it would be worth doing so. Even a large company would C&D before doing anything else. I don't know much about copyright law, especially for Canada, so I don't know what grounds they have to demand that.
  • Originally posted by: Loxx O)))



    They're threatening legal action because you're trying to sell their game that you own?

    When those "games that you own" are all illegal bootlegs that he made, yes.



    Maybe this is a hint Guntz that you should stop making and selling this crap?
  • I don't know why but I find it funny pegboy was the first to mention that, heh. Thanks man.
  • I find it strange that they would threaten legal action on an unreleased game for a 30 year old console.
  • If you got a letter then talk with a lawyer before responding to them, and take down everything you have in good faith.

    Regarding the 30 year thing....it's still their intellectual property. In fact every single reproduction of unreleased games is still owned by *someone* unless they have released the source code into public domain.

    So these guys are well into their rights.
  • No letter, just an email. Unfortunately I did reply to it...
  • Good idea to have a thread on it?



    Looks like they're still around and have previously put old IPs on the phone, according to my wiki reading.
  • I'd brush up on copyright law, and see if they even have a leg to stand on
  • Its gonna cost you a few hundred bucks just to talk to a lawyer, not worth it.
  • I don't think emails are actually formal since there's a layer of probably deniability and no real way of proving who's behind the keyboard but that's thinking a little way to far ahead of the line.



    They most likely just want to protect their IP. But just in case I would ask for a free consultation with a lawyer in your area, let them read the interactions and see what they say.
  • Originally posted by: BertBerryCrunch

    I'd brush up on copyright law, and see if they even have a leg to stand on



    They're likely WELL into their rights. If an unreleased copy of my book got out there and someone reprinted and released it any time after 70 years of my death then I or my estate have the rights to persue legal action. Same applies to anything created on or after January 1st...1977 I think? So almost every single game, book, video, picture, and song made in the US is still covered.
  • yeah they are very likely within their rights I agree. The code belongs to them. The cartridge belongs to you.
  • In the email there are a couple screen caps of the purported copyright infringement, but they're clearly mobile device captures, tablet to be specific. Would a real company email actually do that?
  • Originally posted by: BertBerryCrunch



    I'd brush up on copyright law, and see if they even have a leg to stand on

    Google lawyers are the best lawyers.

     
    Originally posted by: JosephLeo



    I don't think emails are actually formal since there's a layer of probably deniability and no real way of proving who's behind the keyboard but that's thinking a little way to far ahead of the line.

     

    Emails are plenty "formal" and legal. I've submitted them to the court often. They are open to a greater level of perusal/questionsing of validity, of course.



    As others have said, chances are they are well within their rights. 



    I'd be interested to know exactly what their demands were, if they were anything outside a standard C&D.

     
    Originally posted by: Guntz



    In the email there are a couple screen caps of the purported copyright infringement, but they're clearly mobile device captures, tablet to be specific. Would a real company email actually do that?



    You'd be surprised how lazy/unprofessional a lot of legal departments are, if this even came from anyone with a legal background. Especially ones from small companies such as this.



    If you are concerned you should seek counsel. There are likely plenty of folks around taking up pro bono cases near you, if you even feel it is worth your time. Would be much easier to just stop, of course.
  • The email mentioned nothing about a C&D, they wanted sales and accounts information.
  • Originally posted by: pegboy

    Originally posted by: Loxx O)))



    They're threatening legal action because you're trying to sell their game that you own?

    When those "games that you own" are all illegal bootlegs that he made, yes.



    Maybe this is a hint Guntz that you should stop making and selling this crap?





    Lol
  • Originally posted by: Guntz



    The email mentioned nothing about a C&D, they wanted sales and accounts information.

    That sounds sketchy.

     
  • Originally posted by: Guntz



    The email mentioned nothing about a C&D, they wanted sales and accounts information.



    Sounds ultra lazy and just prodding to see if you are worth their time.
  • IP thing is one thing,,, but I'll be questioning how the heck they got my email...
  • Originally posted by: Guntz



    The email mentioned nothing about a C&D, they wanted sales and accounts information.



    Whaaaaaat? That seems like an odd request, no?
  • Originally posted by: JosephLeo

     If an unreleased copy of my book got out there and someone reprinted and released it any time after 70 years of my death then I or my estate have the rights to persue legal action. Same applies to anything created on or after January 1st...1977 I think?

    Depends on the publication/creation date, as the law changed several times over the years. For most things after the first of 1978, yeah (work for hire might be different, though.)



    This is similar to the physical slider I use at work.

    http://librarycopyright.net/resources/digitalslider/
  • Source Code I thought was a good movie.
  • Originally posted by: mattbep

     
    Originally posted by: Guntz



    The email mentioned nothing about a C&D, they wanted sales and accounts information.



    Whaaaaaat? That seems like an odd request, no?



    basis for damages perhaps?

     
  • Courts love emails. Not only do you have a time stamp but a written copy of what was said between both parties and you can also see a record of how many times a person was reached.
  • Originally posted by: mattbep

    Originally posted by: Guntz



    The email mentioned nothing about a C&D, they wanted sales and accounts information.



    Whaaaaaat? That seems like an odd request, no?





    That seems like a great request from somebody ready to sue your ass.
  • Originally posted by: dquiros



    Source Code I thought was a good movie.



    It was reasonably well made and there were some interesting ideas in the story, but the resolution was too dumb for my tastes. 



    On the other hand, responding in anyway to legal correspondance before consulting a laywer is a terrible idea, especially for anything more involved than a c&d. @guntz if you haven't spoken to one yet, get off the forum and find one now.

     
Sign In or Register to comment.