In the Wild hunting just got harder

I was cruising ebay today and I noticed this listing by the Seattle Goodwill. I'm just wondering how much longer it will take before the rest of the company follows suit. I have noticed a severe drop in good games at my local goodwill as of late,. Oh well.

http://cgi.ebay.com/Lot-of-16-Nintendo-NES-Games-8-w-Original-Boxes_W0QQitemZ310127860858QQcmdZViewItemQQptZVideo_Games_Games?hash=item310127860858&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=66:4|65%3A10|39%3A1|240%3A1318

Comments

  • the seattle good will has been listing on e-bay for many years, its nothing new...



    and from time to time they actually have some good lots... i remember one lot they sold having a yellow zelda test cart in it..
  • "Member: since Jun-03-02" - certainly not new. It is already expected that many places like Goodwill have people working there who go through the inventory first. No video game from any system ever appears at my local Goodwill and I think I know the employee to blame...
  • There are a ton of Goodwill stores that do the online thing. And, on their auction site, stuff always gets a huge premium. It's pretty annoying as I have a similar problem of not finding crap at any Goodwill near me. The random little thrift stores, however, sometimes have some decent stuff.
  • Originally posted by: bunnyboy

    "Member: since Jun-03-02" - certainly not new. It is already expected that many places like Goodwill have people working there who go through the inventory first. No video game from any system ever appears at my local Goodwill and I think I know the employee to blame...

    We get a handful of games put out but never any good deals as there are a couple resellers that work at the two thrift stores in town who pull anything worth more than a couple bucks.
  • Makes me sick that Goodwill does that.All the stuff they get is free and alot of their employees are volunteers at least at my local Goodwill.
  • ^ It makes you sick that a non-profit organization is making the money it deserves in order to help out the less fortunate in your community?
  • Originally posted by: TokinAlot

    Makes me sick that Goodwill does that.All the stuff they get is free and alot of their employees are volunteers at least at my local Goodwill.



    They're not volunteers.  Goodwill hires criminals and retarded people to give them work experience, since no one else will hire them.  They're charity work isn't selling cheap stuff to poor people, their main goal is to help people who normally would  have trouble getting work, get a job.
  • Some of them know a bit, some don't. There are still a number of thrift stores like this that don't have a clue and tag the same price on an NES game that they do on an N64 game.
  • I don't have a problem with Thrift Stores auctioning things online in the least. No ones entitled to the wears there so they can do with it what they like.



    My local Salvation Army/Goodwill never put anything out front as far as games go. If you go the back of the store though and ask if they have any video games I've been fortunate enough a few times that employees will take me to a huge box of gaming stuff.



    I've gotten a couple Sega Saturns, Ataris, Tons of Games from this method. If you get to know the people that work there and treat them well, they'll look out for you.



  • I think we had a huge discussion in a previous thread about this. Many on both sides of the fence on this one.
  • Interesting to note that Seattle Goodwill has a policy preventing employees from buying anything that hasn't been on the store shelves for at least 48 hours. The policy exists because they feel that allowing employees to cherry pick the good stuff will discourage shoppers from coming in. When I asked the local store manager if the online selling didn't have the same effect, the answer was "Ummmm....". While they might get more for the items they sell online, if I don't go in looking for games I also won't be buying a shirt, book, or other item I might've bought. Overall, this policy is *not* helping thier bottom line but they are unwilling to admit that.

  • Originally posted by: nrslam

    Interesting to note that Seattle Goodwill has a policy preventing employees from buying anything that hasn't been on the store shelves for at least 48 hours. The policy exists because they feel that allowing employees to cherry pick the good stuff will discourage shoppers from coming in. When I asked the local store manager if the online selling didn't have the same effect, the answer was "Ummmm....". While they might get more for the items they sell online, if I don't go in looking for games I also won't be buying a shirt, book, or other item I might've bought. Overall, this policy is *not* helping thier bottom line but they are unwilling to admit that.


    Ok but the problem with your arguement is this... so say they don't sell their NES games on eBay?  Ok fine... so instead they sell them on the store shelves and a reseller comes in abd gets them.  So in your arguement the reseller buys say 10 NES games for $2 each and a T-shirt for $1 and a book for $1 so they make $22.  They put that same lot on eBay and it's gonna sell for more than $22 everytime.  I see some of their lots that get up into the multiple hundreds of dollars that someone else would come in and buy from them for nothing and let's say they buy 5 books and 5 shirts, still isn't gonna equal what they get on eBay.
  • all in all goodwill is good... their CEOs make too much money, but it is for a good cause. When I donate items I don't take them to Goodwill... it is usually the Salvation Army or St. Vincent Depaul who gets my unwanted crap.
  • Originally posted by: Braveheart69

    Originally posted by: nrslam

    Interesting to note that Seattle Goodwill has a policy preventing employees from buying anything that hasn't been on the store shelves for at least 48 hours. The policy exists because they feel that allowing employees to cherry pick the good stuff will discourage shoppers from coming in. When I asked the local store manager if the online selling didn't have the same effect, the answer was "Ummmm....". While they might get more for the items they sell online, if I don't go in looking for games I also won't be buying a shirt, book, or other item I might've bought. Overall, this policy is *not* helping thier bottom line but they are unwilling to admit that.


    Ok but the problem with your arguement is this... so say they don't sell their NES games on eBay?  Ok fine... so instead they sell them on the store shelves and a reseller comes in abd gets them.  So in your arguement the reseller buys say 10 NES games for $2 each and a T-shirt for $1 and a book for $1 so they make $22.  They put that same lot on eBay and it's gonna sell for more than $22 everytime.  I see some of their lots that get up into the multiple hundreds of dollars that someone else would come in and buy from them for nothing and let's say they buy 5 books and 5 shirts, still isn't gonna equal what they get on eBay.

    If I were the only person who stopped shopping there because of thier online policies, your argument would have merit.  However there are lots of collectors in the Seattle area and I'd venture to say that a high percentage of them have quit shopping there.  Now Goodwill can't sell those people anything.  And you've neglected to mention that Seattle Goodwill has 2 or 3 people doing online sales full time.  That's a lot of salary & benefit costs, plus the lost incidental sales, ebay & paypal fees, and other expenses to overcome just to break even.

    But my original point wasn't to argue the profitability of the online sales, just to point out the irony.  Employees can't cherry pick because that discourages walk-in shoppers, but the corporation allows itself to cherry pick and it has the same consequence.

     


  • ^ if the customers that they lost, they lost because they were underselling things they could get more for online, then they have a net gain.



    Those people weren't their target clientele to begin with if they were just looking to make a profit off of the pricing staff's poor marketing.



    No matter the venue, it's up to the purveyor to decide how best to make money with the resources at hand. More power to them for getting top dollar for the stuff that's donated to them. If I donated video games to Goodwill, I'd rather Goodwill make the most money possible, than some kid in trying to make a buck without joining the workforce.
  • Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Goodwill a charity in and of itself? Like, they give people jobs that normally couldn't get them, and that's the charity. So if you ask me, them selling things online isn't benefiting anyone but the higher-ups. It's not like Salvation Army where they offer beds and meals and such.
  • Even though they're "nonprofit" the more they make as an entity, the more they can devote to hiring extra staff that aren't optimally productive, like employees with mild Down Syndrome.



    Although I'm no watchdog, I can't personally say how much actually goes towards this, and how much just lines pockets along the way -- but if the corp follows its charter perfectly, this is how it should work.
  • Originally posted by: nrslam

    If I were the only person who stopped shopping there because of thier online policies, your argument would have merit.  However there are lots of collectors in the Seattle area and I'd venture to say that a high percentage of them have quit shopping there.  Now Goodwill can't sell those people anything.  And you've neglected to mention that Seattle Goodwill has 2 or 3 people doing online sales full time.  That's a lot of salary & benefit costs, plus the lost incidental sales, ebay & paypal fees, and other expenses to overcome just to break even.

    But my original point wasn't to argue the profitability of the online sales, just to point out the irony.  Employees can't cherry pick because that discourages walk-in shoppers, but the corporation allows itself to cherry pick and it has the same consequence.

    Working in retail as a manger myself I would imagine the real reason they don't want employees purchasing the stuff is they would probably mark it even lower then it should be. The temptation and justification would be to easy for employees, especially the ones at the bottom of the food chain

Sign In or Register to comment.