I dont love the idea of trusting Gloves (he stabbed my back twice in Survivor) but this is a TEAM game. He may be trying to help the town with a win. That being said if we don't lynch first day and we get nothing I think we can all agree he gets lynched next.
This mentality is why everyone is always quiet, and nobody puts forth plans, and town loses.
Can you at least explain your zealotry? It's pretty clear where each person stands. Why, when there's not even been any true voting activity do you keep railing so hard against it? Most of us felt comfortable saying how we felt once or twice. Didn't need to bomb the thread with NO VOTE NO VOTE.
@Gloves You're plan has to be a short term one. As in one day. I understand what you are saying about long term, but plans also have to have some form of immediate results in this type of game. If you are certain of your plan, then you should be certain it won't fail.
@Gloves You're plan has to be a short term one. As in one day. I understand what you are saying about long term, but plans also have to have some form of immediate results in this type of game. If you are certain of your plan, then you should be certain it won't fail.
The immediate effect is simple. A town will not be dead.
I dont love the idea of trusting Gloves (he stabbed my back twice in Survivor) but this is a TEAM game. He may be trying to help the town with a win. That being said if we don't lynch first day and we get nothing I think we can all agree he gets lynched next.
This mentality is why everyone is always quiet, and nobody puts forth plans, and town loses.
Can you at least explain your zealotry? It's pretty clear where each person stands. Why, when there's not even been any true voting activity do you keep railing so hard against it? Most of us felt comfortable saying how we felt once or twice. Didn't need to bomb the thread with NO VOTE NO VOTE.
As I said last game, I am simply quite active. I very much believe in no lynch day 1. And so, eying the type of person I am, I fight for it.
I do not believe in the town's ability to use the "data" from a day 1 lynch to track wolves. Simply look at the last game. The ONLY wolf kill was because later in the game (after a bunch of town deaths) the seer caught wasg in the act.
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I dont love the idea of trusting Gloves (he stabbed my back twice in Survivor) but this is a TEAM game. He may be trying to help the town with a win. That being said if we don't lynch first day and we get nothing I think we can all agree he gets lynched next.
This mentality is why everyone is always quiet, and nobody puts forth plans, and town loses.
I am the king of putting forward (mostly hated) plans
So gloves, let's say we go for a no lynch day
Is the only danger of me dangling myself out there, if a townie foolishly finshing me off? Otherwise what is the risk? I'm not even asking anyone to buy into me. If we'd already settled on a no lynch, it shouldn't be too hard to contain the impulse to take my head.
I dont love the idea of trusting Gloves (he stabbed my back twice in Survivor) but this is a TEAM game. He may be trying to help the town with a win. That being said if we don't lynch first day and we get nothing I think we can all agree he gets lynched next.
This mentality is why everyone is always quiet, and nobody puts forth plans, and town loses.
I am the king of putting forward (mostly hated) plans
So gloves, let's say we go for a no lynch day
Is the only danger of me dangling myself out there, if a townie foolishly finshing me off? Otherwise what is the risk? I'm not even asking anyone to buy into me. If we'd already settled on a no lynch, it shouldn't be too hard to contain the impulse to take my head.
All it takes is one town who disagrees, or to fuck it up.
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
It's hard being optimistic in a room with 19 other people and everyone is pointing a gun at everyone else.
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
It's hard being optimistic in a room with 19 other people and everyone is pointing a gun at everyone else.
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
It's hard being optimistic in a room with 19 other people and everyone is pointing a gun at everyone else.
I'm not pointing a gun at anyone.
Yeah, you're the one pushing hard to take away the town's gun when there are killers around, saying 'Hey friend, you don't need to use that. :winky smile face:'
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
It's hard being optimistic in a room with 19 other people and everyone is pointing a gun at everyone else.
I'm not pointing a gun at anyone.
Yeah, you're the one pushing hard to take away the town's gun when there are killers around, saying 'Hey friend, you don't need to use that. :winky smile face:'
I'm saying don't shoot into the crowd. You're going to hit friends.
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
It's hard being optimistic in a room with 19 other people and everyone is pointing a gun at everyone else.
I'm not pointing a gun at anyone.
Yeah, you're the one pushing hard to take away the town's gun when there are killers around, saying 'Hey friend, you don't need to use that. :winky smile face:'
I'm saying don't shoot into the crowd. You're going to hit friends.
We have 21 players, if I'm not mistaken that means we need 11 votes on someone to lynch? And there's what, two votes out on two different people? I don't think anyone is pointing guns at anyone, why must you keep hammering it in?
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
It's hard being optimistic in a room with 19 other people and everyone is pointing a gun at everyone else.
I'm not pointing a gun at anyone.
Yeah, you're the one pushing hard to take away the town's gun when there are killers around, saying 'Hey friend, you don't need to use that. :winky smile face:'
I'm saying don't shoot into the crowd. You're going to hit friends.
We have 21 players, if I'm not mistaken that means we need 11 votes on someone to lynch? And there's what, two votes out on two different people? I don't think anyone is pointing guns at anyone, why must you keep hammering it in?
There town, you have three possibilities, we lynch (limbo presented RNG, except he did it before we publicly assigned x and y so it wasn't truly random), we follow Gloves and do nothing, or we do my thing which would probably also be nothing.
Im going to follow Gloves and do nothing. I am curious what will happen, there must be a reason for his confidence and I'm hoping it's in favor of the town. I feel like a wolf wouldn't be so pushy on a no lynch, since odds are it would be a townie that got lynched. I'm just going with my gut here. Let's see what happens.
There town, you have three possibilities, we lynch (limbo presented RNG, except he did it before we publicly assigned x and y so it wasn't truly random), we follow Gloves and do nothing, or we do my thing which would probably also be nothing.
I'll get behind whatever town decides
You reminded me of a new rule that will go into effect Day 2 - no self voting.
There town, you have three possibilities, we lynch (limbo presented RNG, except he did it before we publicly assigned x and y so it wasn't truly random), we follow Gloves and do nothing, or we do my thing which would probably also be nothing.
I'll get behind whatever town decides
You reminded me of a new rule that will go into effect Day 2 - no self voting.
There town, you have three possibilities, we lynch (limbo presented RNG, except he did it before we publicly assigned x and y so it wasn't truly random), we follow Gloves and do nothing, or we do my thing which would probably also be nothing.
I'll get behind whatever town decides
You reminded me of a new rule that will go into effect Day 2 - no self voting.
Comments
I dont love the idea of trusting Gloves (he stabbed my back twice in Survivor) but this is a TEAM game. He may be trying to help the town with a win. That being said if we don't lynch first day and we get nothing I think we can all agree he gets lynched next.
This mentality is why everyone is always quiet, and nobody puts forth plans, and town loses.
Can you at least explain your zealotry? It's pretty clear where each person stands. Why, when there's not even been any true voting activity do you keep railing so hard against it? Most of us felt comfortable saying how we felt once or twice. Didn't need to bomb the thread with NO VOTE NO VOTE.
dragoon/barnes - can we get a vote count / confirmation of my vote being eligible now?
I can in about an hour of jmbarnes can't get to it before then.
@Gloves You're plan has to be a short term one. As in one day. I understand what you are saying about long term, but plans also have to have some form of immediate results in this type of game. If you are certain of your plan, then you should be certain it won't fail.
The immediate effect is simple. A town will not be dead.
How hard is this?
I dont love the idea of trusting Gloves (he stabbed my back twice in Survivor) but this is a TEAM game. He may be trying to help the town with a win. That being said if we don't lynch first day and we get nothing I think we can all agree he gets lynched next.
This mentality is why everyone is always quiet, and nobody puts forth plans, and town loses.
Can you at least explain your zealotry? It's pretty clear where each person stands. Why, when there's not even been any true voting activity do you keep railing so hard against it? Most of us felt comfortable saying how we felt once or twice. Didn't need to bomb the thread with NO VOTE NO VOTE.
As I said last game, I am simply quite active. I very much believe in no lynch day 1. And so, eying the type of person I am, I fight for it.
I do not believe in the town's ability to use the "data" from a day 1 lynch to track wolves. Simply look at the last game. The ONLY wolf kill was because later in the game (after a bunch of town deaths) the seer caught wasg in the act.
A person with a role lead to the only wolf kill.
Phone autocorrect
**vote: Bronty
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I dont love the idea of trusting Gloves (he stabbed my back twice in Survivor) but this is a TEAM game. He may be trying to help the town with a win. That being said if we don't lynch first day and we get nothing I think we can all agree he gets lynched next.
This mentality is why everyone is always quiet, and nobody puts forth plans, and town loses.
I am the king of putting forward (mostly hated) plans
So gloves, let's say we go for a no lynch day
Is the only danger of me dangling myself out there, if a townie foolishly finshing me off? Otherwise what is the risk? I'm not even asking anyone to buy into me. If we'd already settled on a no lynch, it shouldn't be too hard to contain the impulse to take my head.
I dont love the idea of trusting Gloves (he stabbed my back twice in Survivor) but this is a TEAM game. He may be trying to help the town with a win. That being said if we don't lynch first day and we get nothing I think we can all agree he gets lynched next.
This mentality is why everyone is always quiet, and nobody puts forth plans, and town loses.
I am the king of putting forward (mostly hated) plans
So gloves, let's say we go for a no lynch day
Is the only danger of me dangling myself out there, if a townie foolishly finshing me off? Otherwise what is the risk? I'm not even asking anyone to buy into me. If we'd already settled on a no lynch, it shouldn't be too hard to contain the impulse to take my head.
All it takes is one town who disagrees, or to fuck it up.
This happened like 3 times last game.
Well if they disagree they should speak up, not just make an impulsive move
Should.
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
Well if they disagree they should speak up, not just make an impulsive move
Should.
There are no absolutes in werewolf
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
It's hard being optimistic in a room with 19 other people and everyone is pointing a gun at everyone else.
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
It's hard being optimistic in a room with 19 other people and everyone is pointing a gun at everyone else.
I'm not pointing a gun at anyone.
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
It's hard being optimistic in a room with 19 other people and everyone is pointing a gun at everyone else.
I'm not pointing a gun at anyone.
Yeah, you're the one pushing hard to take away the town's gun when there are killers around, saying 'Hey friend, you don't need to use that. :winky smile face:'
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
It's hard being optimistic in a room with 19 other people and everyone is pointing a gun at everyone else.
I'm not pointing a gun at anyone.
Yeah, you're the one pushing hard to take away the town's gun when there are killers around, saying 'Hey friend, you don't need to use that. :winky smile face:'
I'm saying don't shoot into the crowd. You're going to hit friends.
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
It's hard being optimistic in a room with 19 other people and everyone is pointing a gun at everyone else.
I'm not pointing a gun at anyone.
Yeah, you're the one pushing hard to take away the town's gun when there are killers around, saying 'Hey friend, you don't need to use that. :winky smile face:'
I'm saying don't shoot into the crowd. You're going to hit friends.
Might hit friends.
I just did Dra600n's post - Brock's post regarding picking a random person, then divided by 2, since there are two people running the game. 393-361=32 32/2=16. #16 is Bronty.
**vote: Bronty
On the extreme opposite of Gloves you are 100% for killing someone, that is just as suspicious.
I'm fine if you feel it looks suspicious. A no vote is like saying we shouldn't even try. I'm an optimist...I would like a small chance of nabbing a wolf rather than no chance. Wouldn't you?
It's hard being optimistic in a room with 19 other people and everyone is pointing a gun at everyone else.
I'm not pointing a gun at anyone.
Yeah, you're the one pushing hard to take away the town's gun when there are killers around, saying 'Hey friend, you don't need to use that. :winky smile face:'
I'm saying don't shoot into the crowd. You're going to hit friends.
Might hit friends.
Odds are you will hit friends.
We have 21 players, if I'm not mistaken that means we need 11 votes on someone to lynch? And there's what, two votes out on two different people? I don't think anyone is pointing guns at anyone, why must you keep hammering it in?
I'm just talking about it and replying to people.
If you all want me to shut up I will.
Vote: Brock Landers
There town, you have three possibilities, we lynch (limbo presented RNG, except he did it before we publicly assigned x and y so it wasn't truly random), we follow Gloves and do nothing, or we do my thing which would probably also be nothing.
I'll get behind whatever town decides
Originally posted by: Brock Landers
Fuck it
Vote: Brock Landers
There town, you have three possibilities, we lynch (limbo presented RNG, except he did it before we publicly assigned x and y so it wasn't truly random), we follow Gloves and do nothing, or we do my thing which would probably also be nothing.
I'll get behind whatever town decides
You reminded me of a new rule that will go into effect Day 2 - no self voting.
Fuck it
Vote: Brock Landers
There town, you have three possibilities, we lynch (limbo presented RNG, except he did it before we publicly assigned x and y so it wasn't truly random), we follow Gloves and do nothing, or we do my thing which would probably also be nothing.
I'll get behind whatever town decides
You reminded me of a new rule that will go into effect Day 2 - no self voting.
Originally posted by: Brock Landers
Originally posted by: dra600n
Originally posted by: Brock Landers
Fuck it
Vote: Brock Landers
There town, you have three possibilities, we lynch (limbo presented RNG, except he did it before we publicly assigned x and y so it wasn't truly random), we follow Gloves and do nothing, or we do my thing which would probably also be nothing.
I'll get behind whatever town decides
You reminded me of a new rule that will go into effect Day 2 - no self voting.
As you wish
Votes:
Limbofunk (1): Bronty
Bronty (1): Limbofunk
Brock Landers (1): Masturbating
Players Required for Lynch: 11 out of 21
Hours Remaining: 6 Hours and 45 minutes