Why do sellers post "questions" like this?
http://cgi.ebay.com/143-NES-GAME-LOT-NINTENDO-NO-DUPS-RARES-COMMONS_W0QQitemZ270380012747QQihZ017QQcategoryZ31583QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
I was thinking about bidding but read the Q&A section, seriously, why would you post that for all to see?
I was thinking about bidding but read the Q&A section, seriously, why would you post that for all to see?
Comments
i wonder what prompted the "why don't you go f yourself"?
i wonder what prompted the "why don't you go f yourself"?
I'm sure a few emails were exchanged prior. Started out as an offer to buy it early and before you knew it things got personal.
Maybe that bit about not leaving feedback to people under 10 until they've done so first? I don't even know why he has to state that, I don't leave feedback until I've received it almost always.
I believe the seller should always leave feeback first. I as the buyer, doesn't care if I have feedback (long as have mere than 10 or so). I currently have like 175 and have no need for any more. If I sell somthing, once I get paid the buyer gets the feedabck.
That being said, I never let a feedback go unwritten... it's only a matter of time, and being sure that the transaction is actually complete in that the buyer is satisfied as well. Not that I'm much of a seller these days anyway... I go through phases of clearing stuff out every so many months.
But, back to topic... what a screwed up question and answer. Maybe the seller didn't realize they were publishing it?
Maybe that bit about not leaving feedback to people under 10 until they've done so first? I don't even know why he has to state that, I don't leave feedback until I've received it almost always.
I believe the seller should always leave feeback first. I as the buyer, doesn't care if I have feedback (long as have mere than 10 or so). I currently have like 175 and have no need for any more. If I sell somthing, once I get paid the buyer gets the feedabck.
a seller should allways leave feedback as soon as there paid for an auction, there is no need to hold it back any more to try for a retalitory negative since a seller can no longer leave negative.
got something against west virginia
no doug, just you
i was hoping you would see that post.
Maybe that bit about not leaving feedback to people under 10 until they've done so first? I don't even know why he has to state that, I don't leave feedback until I've received it almost always.
I believe the seller should always leave feeback first. I as the buyer, doesn't care if I have feedback (long as have mere than 10 or so). I currently have like 175 and have no need for any more. If I sell somthing, once I get paid the buyer gets the feedabck.
a seller should allways leave feedback as soon as there paid for an auction, there is no need to hold it back any more to try for a retalitory negative since a seller can no longer leave negative.
I disagree, I would rather not leave feedback at all to someone who negs me then give them a positive.
Although, I have tons of transactions that I never received feedback for so I did recently leave a bunch of feedback first for the buyers. This was in hope of having the favor returned without hounding anyone for feedback. I hate getting, "please leave me feedback," messages.