The Canadian Criminal code section that applies to cyber stalking is section "264.1 (1) criminal harassment", and would in most cases be the mandate of the local police force in your city or town to enforce.
264. (1) Criminal harassment - No person shall, without lawful authority and knowing that another person is harassed or recklessly as to whether the other person is harassed, engage in conduct referred to in subsection (2) that causes that other person reasonably, in all the circumstances, to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to them.
(2) The conduct mentioned in subsection (1) consists of
(a) Repeatedly following from place to place the other person or anyone known to them;
(b) Repeatedly communicating with, either directly or indirectly, the other person or anyone known to them;
(c) Besetting or watching the dwelling-house, or place where the other person, or anyone known to them, resides, works, carries on business or happens to be; or
(d) Engaging in threatening conduct directed at the other person or any member of their family.
I suppose that may be applicable...probably something more relevant out there though, I just came up with that via a quick scan of the RCMP's section on internet offenses. Maybe there's something the FBI can do, but I'll leave that up to Dain. I'm gonna start checking CSIS and see if there's something they can do...
For Dain. Quick link to applicable report pages for the FBI, Secret Service, and the ICCC. This is getting rediculous. The message needs to be sent that this bullshit is NOT acceptable, EVER.
Comments
The Canadian Criminal code section that applies to cyber stalking is section "264.1 (1) criminal harassment", and would in most cases be the mandate of the local police force in your city or town to enforce.
264. (1) Criminal harassment - No person shall, without lawful authority and knowing that another person is harassed or recklessly as to whether the other person is harassed, engage in conduct referred to in subsection (2) that causes that other person reasonably, in all the circumstances, to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to them.
(2) The conduct mentioned in subsection (1) consists of
(a) Repeatedly following from place to place the other person or anyone known to them;
(b) Repeatedly communicating with, either directly or indirectly, the other person or anyone known to them;
(c) Besetting or watching the dwelling-house, or place where the other person, or anyone known to them, resides, works, carries on business or happens to be; or
(d) Engaging in threatening conduct directed at the other person or any member of their family.
I suppose that may be applicable...probably something more relevant out there though, I just came up with that via a quick scan of the RCMP's section on internet offenses. Maybe there's something the FBI can do, but I'll leave that up to Dain. I'm gonna start checking CSIS and see if there's something they can do...
For Dain. Quick link to applicable report pages for the FBI, Secret Service, and the ICCC. This is getting rediculous. The message needs to be sent that this bullshit is NOT acceptable, EVER.
http://nintendoagemedia.com/humble_pi.gif
anyone take notice that the timer ended at 3:14:15 and PI is 3.1415
Yep I noticed. Clever girl...
girl?
I was referring to the "hacker" in a facetious manner
girl?
ah ah ah you didn't say the magic word
... If Batty didn't tell me about the 3.14.15 thing I never would have figured that one out.
well why don't you tell Batty to stop with this bullshit and grow the fuck up?
i was gone but still logged in
Anyone else?
Wait, is this fun?
Wait, is this fun?
Are you kidding? It's like a water slide, except in stead of water, there's bacon grease.
EDIT: and I don't have pi
Wait, is this fun?
Are you kidding? It's like a water slide, except in stead of water, there's bacon grease.
My mistake.
EDIT: and I don't have pi
Yeah, some of us do, some don't. I sort of fancy one, myself