PSP successor called PS Vita
PS Vita, sounds like a naturist medicine, or a brand of bottled water. Why not just call it PSP2? Even NGP sounds better.
Prices are 249 and 299 dollars. Not too bad, considering the power house it is. Also, several features have been mentioned, like that "Near" thing, that tells you when another Vita (euurrgghhh) player is around. I hope it also tells you what games you share with him/her, so you can arrive and ask for a match.
Comments
They definately won't take the lead of the market. I think they are really taking the wrong track entirely. People want silly little games for portable gaming not epic graphics heavy adventures. The DS is going to remain the leader.. Maybe the 3Ds if it gets cheaper and gets some games out.
Edit: Until the iphone wipes em all out of course
They definately won't take the lead of the market. I think they are really taking the wrong track entirely. People want silly little games for portable gaming not epic graphics heavy adventures. The DS is going to remain the leader.. Maybe the 3Ds if it gets cheaper and gets some games out.
It depends to the kind of people you aim the claim. The PSP and Vita were meant for serious gamers in the first place. For example, I'm a perfect target for this kind of system: a person that can't dedicate time to a home console anymore, but still wants last gen gaming (and has time to kill here and there). Secondly, even if they have big heavy adventures, these can be played if designed well (with many sub-goals that can be tackled relatively fast), and the sleep feature helps too. It also doesn't hurt to have the nice OLED screen for serious portable movie viewing, music, internet... The only thing it would lack is the phone function.
Now, if Sony is smart, they will give more attention/promotion to the TV-Out / PS3 controller capability. That way we can have a portable that can double as a home console if we want (remember how cumbersome was it to bring your console to your friends' houses?). It would kick ass to have two player games without the need of a second Vita, if you're going to connect it to the TV (SF vs Tekken ).
For me, the Vita represents what the PSP promised, and ended being short of. A capable internet browser - out of the box movie/photo/music player with iTunes like software, an established PS Network and Store, and ultimate portable/Tv-able gaming machine, portable television, nice video recording-photo taking...
They definately won't take the lead of the market. I think they are really taking the wrong track entirely. People want silly little games for portable gaming not epic graphics heavy adventures. The DS is going to remain the leader.. Maybe the 3Ds if it gets cheaper and gets some games out.
It depends to the kind of people you aim the claim. The PSP and Vita were meant for serious gamers in the first place. For example, I'm a perfect target for this kind of system: a person that can't dedicate time to a home console anymore, but still wants last gen gaming (and has time to kill here and there). Secondly, even if they have big heavy adventures, these can be played if designed well (with many sub-goals that can be tackled relatively fast), and the sleep feature helps too. It also doesn't hurt to have the nice OLED screen for serious portable movie viewing, music, internet... The only thing it would lack is the phone function.
Now, if Sony is smart, they will give more attention/promotion to the TV-Out / PS3 controller capability. That way we can have a portable that can double as a home console if we want (remember how cumbersome was it to bring your console to your friends' houses?). It would kick ass to have two player games without the need of a second Vita, if you're going to connect it to the TV (SF vs Tekken ).
For me, the Vita represents what the PSP promised, and ended being short of. A capable internet browser - out of the box movie/photo/music player with iTunes like software, an established PS Network and Store, and ultimate portable/Tv-able gaming machine, portable television, nice video recording-photo taking...
I just meant the handheld market in general (overall), I'm not saying it's bad, or even that it won't be plenty successful, but I don't think it is going to take over the market because there are too many people who just don't want what they are offering. It's not like console gaming. Most people just want something quick and fun and distracting in portable gaming I think.
I know personally I myself would rather play astrosmash on my DS than uncharted 2 when I'm waiting for the wife to try on clothes for 15 minutes.. Not that I don't love me some uncharted at home.
In fact, for me, the perfect portable gaming would be something that turns on and off as close to instantly as possible, (maybe even automatically saves RAM when you turn off and defaults to loading the saved ram)
I agree completely. Let's hope that the new physical media they'll use makes loading games lightning fast. And game devs should cut out the crap with intros to their portable games, I want to be taken right to the menu, or even right to the action!
Now, if Sony is smart, they will give more attention/promotion to the TV-Out / PS3 controller capability.
The PS Vita is said to NOT have TV Out
http://www.playstationcollecting.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=23292#p23292
Now, if Sony is smart, they will give more attention/promotion to the TV-Out / PS3 controller capability.
The PS Vita is said to NOT have TV Out
http://www.playstationcollecting.com/forum/viewtopic.ph...
No, you can't use it as a controller, but you can save your game on your PSP into your Sony Cloud and when you sign into your PS3, you can pick it up from there on the PS3
Now, if Sony is smart, they will give more attention/promotion to the TV-Out / PS3 controller capability.
The PS Vita is said to NOT have TV Out
http://www.playstationcollecting.com/forum/viewtopic.ph...
Sony's stupid.
Now, if Sony is smart, they will give more attention/promotion to the TV-Out / PS3 controller capability.
The PS Vita is said to NOT have TV Out
http://www.playstationcollecting.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2...
No, you can't use it as a controller, but you can save your game on your PSP into your Sony Cloud and when you sign into your PS3, you can pick it up from there on the PS3
Lolwut? buttheadridesagain was talking about the PSP Go's ability to pair with a PS3 controller and then output to a TV, not using the PSP/Vita as a PS3 controller (BTW, you CAN use a PSP as a PS3 controller if your PSP can run homebrew )
Yeah
and this will cause Nintendo to stop overcharging on the 3DS which
they're doing. But the bigger question is how much damage will this do
to developers to kit up, process, publish and release games on it vs the
PSP? Odds are since it can cross use PS3 code, games aren't going to
be cheap, probably $50 so PS3 games don't look overpriced at $60. Also
given the long standing Sony tradition on how the PSP and home systems
have been handled, expect expense increases across the board to
developers and consumers, while being nasty about piracy stuff(due to
recent bs and PSP's long standing ongoing rape and pillage.) They won't
take the lead out of the market, but they could easily keep the healthy
chunk they did work up to at the PSPs prime easily enough. I'd get one
but I just can't see affording one for a bit, but I did love my PSP
until piracy killed the releases to the point I sold it (and now
thankfully I can get that 2nd god of war as a PS3 remaster in October so
I'm not sad.)
I have a feeling the Vita price will go up as it nears it's release date. Nintendo has a good hold of the hand held market, but it seems like the 3DS is taking off a bit slow. I think Nintendo will come out on top in the long run, Sony has really struggled with the hand held market. But like Jone said, only time will tell.
Out of curiousity, why do you think that the price will go up? After such an official price reveal at E3, i dont think that there is any chance (maybe 0.1%) that the price will go up I think that it is much more likely that the 3DS price will go down when the PS Vita gets released.
EDIT: Why does one of the quotes looks strange?