isnt 4k a good price for it. i think someone on the forum bought one for 4,000 once. (i read the first 2 pages of this thread so it might have been stated already)
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IN THE LISTINGS WAS AN INCH TEAR IN THE SHRINKWRAP THAT HE DIDNT MENTION OF WHICH WAS ALREADY TORN!!!!
and he changed the listing from 7 days to 10, he also states this is for a divorice.....so why would you want to sell it if your wife might* not have a clue to what its worth and instead fill her pockets up more?
what a dildo
who do you guys think told him to relist?
eh. probably told the wife the games aren't worth crap. for a divorce can also mean to pay legal bills or whatever relating to the divorce.
Not that it is going to have any impact on it getting any bids, but I am personally going to not bid on the listing in respect to Ant. We should try to get all the potential bidders together and see if we can manage to block the listing somehow. I want this, even given the starting bid, but not given the circumstances.
I dunno. I mean at what point does this stop. If we go down this path then this copy should never be bought or sold again because ant once had a right to it. Ie when the current buyer sells in a few years it can't be purchased either because it was once questionable?
Call me an a-hole but to me if the sale didn't go through, it didn't go through and its fair game at this point.
(although actively trying to get the sale to fail is an a-hole move...)
Here is a better idea. I will bid 20000.00 on this one, I won't pay. Then when he relists it, someone else bid 20000.00. As NA we can make it to where he never sells this thing at auction. BUT then some douche will sidew deal it anyway. Can't win.
Here is a better idea. I will bid 20000.00 on this one, I won't pay. Then when he relists it, someone else bid 20000.00. As NA we can make it to where he never sells this thing at auction. BUT then some douche will sidew deal it anyway. Can't win.
I sent him this message:You know damn well you did not make a mistake in the listing.You need to honor your $4,000 BIN that you had on the game to begin with.That is fraud to lie about something like this.It was your bad not doing market research on the game to find a suitable BIN.Prepare to get flooded with 100's of these messages.This is Shady shit,and the NES collecting community is VERY tight nit.DO THE RIGHT THING PLEASE!!
You know the person who blow it for Ant?? Off with his head!! Thats some BAD collecting Karma right there,May he never get another CIB NES game in his life.
Comments
is it the one that has a starting bid of 6,500.00? just making sure we are talking about the same one here
yah it was a 4k BIN at first.
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IN THE LISTINGS WAS AN INCH TEAR IN THE SHRINKWRAP THAT HE DIDNT MENTION OF WHICH WAS ALREADY TORN!!!!
and he changed the listing from 7 days to 10, he also states this is for a divorice.....so why would you want to sell it if your wife might* not have a clue to what its worth and instead fill her pockets up more?
what a dildo
who do you guys think told him to relist?
eh. probably told the wife the games aren't worth crap. for a divorce can also mean to pay legal bills or whatever relating to the divorce.
We should try to get all the potential bidders together and see if we can manage to block the listing somehow.
I want this, even given the starting bid, but not given the circumstances.
Dude, what you did was a serious douche move, take someones money then relist, all just to fill up ur stupid divorced wifes pockets
Have you no class?
*raises eyebrow*
Not that it is going to have any impact on it getting any bids, but I am personally going to not bid on the listing in respect to Ant.
We should try to get all the potential bidders together and see if we can manage to block the listing somehow.
I want this, even given the starting bid, but not given the circumstances.
I dunno. I mean at what point does this stop. If we go down this path then this copy should never be bought or sold again because ant once had a right to it. Ie when the current buyer sells in a few years it can't be purchased either because it was once questionable?
Call me an a-hole but to me if the sale didn't go through, it didn't go through and its fair game at this point.
(although actively trying to get the sale to fail is an a-hole move...)
Here is a better idea. I will bid 20000.00 on this one, I won't pay. Then when he relists it, someone else bid 20000.00. As NA we can make it to where he never sells this thing at auction. BUT then some douche will sidew deal it anyway. Can't win.
exactly.
*raises other eyebrow*
Dain, I'm in for $20 for the "find out who's an unbelievable prick" fund.
No longer necessary. I know who it is and I'll leave it up to him to come clean, should he choose to.
Dain, I'm in for $20 for the "find out who's an unbelievable prick" fund.
No longer necessary. I know who it is and I'll leave it up to him to come clean, should he choose to.
I'm in for $20 if you release the name to the forum.