New feedback policy for eBay

And there was much rejoicing....

Seller input leads to feedback changes

Based
on input from sellers on recent changes to feedback and eBay's links
policy, we're announcing some important adjustments: a new process,
coming soon, will allow buyers to revise feedback when sellers can
rectify the issue; neutral feedback will no longer be counted in your
public percentage score; the policy announced in May covering links in
sellers' listings or other eBay pages will not be enforced. Instead,
we'll be announcing a clearer and more comprehensive links policy in
mid August. Check the July 10 Announcement Board post from Lorrie Norrington for more details.


-------

So my percentage should go back up to 9.7 or 9.8 when neutrals drop, and finally letting buyers revise FB is a GIGANTIC shift in the feedback paradigm. I take back everything I said about eBay having such a strict policy simply to sell more "feedback mediations" where people buy them off. Of course, it may have been true, but it seems it didn't pan out for them so they just decided to be responsible and give the people what they want.

What was this links policy though, I didn't read about that.

Comments

  • well now as a buyer, you could switch a positive to a negative too.
  • Links policy: The updated links policy, which takes effect in July, limits the use of links from eBay listings or other eBay pages to sites within eBay or eBay properties like Half.com or StubHub. For example, eBay sellers may use the About Me page to promote their eBay listings, but they'll no longer be able to use the page to link to their off-eBay Web stores.



    Additionally, sellers will no longer be permitted to link to pages that further describe the item for sale or explain additional terms and conditions. All of this information must now be included within the item description, according to McDonald.



    Exceptions to the links policy include: links to third-party solutions and services directly related to the listing (such as Auctiva); and links to photos of an item for sale on eBay, as long as the page displaying the photo does not reference or link to any off-eBay site offering products for sale.
  • wow, my wife and I thought it might be that restrictive "just cuz" it's eBay but so know that they seriously eliminated pretty well all links is just a shame. I understand axing commerce links, but all info links too - I guess it's just too much work for them to click into each one and investigate, they just would rather have a list of "allowed" domains and automatically seek out and disable all others.



    I wonder if there are any human eyes left - we toyed with the idea of having a static image, no link, that just has the URL of an outside store. We'd see how long that lasts.



    Although they're probably smarter than that, I'm sure they keep track of where people exit to, and a flag goes up if a certain user has multiple typed URLs to the same outside domain from their pages. Then they just give it a pageview and slap on wrist.
  • I used to have .com in the picture of my logo and someone ratted me out pretty quickly. That was before the policy change to only ebay links. At that time you could have links to a site if it gave more info on products, and did not compete with ebay for sales. My site has never been a sales site, but they said it was not allowed because it could be a retail site at some point.
  • Thats too strict on links if you ask me. Can you still embed videos?
  • So you can't use photobucket for description pics?

  • I do and I have, they haven't come down on that yet. I guess so long as they're not clickables. I just copy in the raw URL's and write tags around them so I haven't had a problem.
  • Not sure what I think about the links yet, but I have to say I am very happy about removing neutrals from the feedback percentage. Now mine will go back from 93% to 100%.
  • ....also I wonder if this will give DG a big enough buffer to not be near that 95% threshold.
  • DiscountGames has half and half neuts and negs so they should be up to 97.5% so I'd assume the standard of 95% would have to change as well, it wouldn't make sense otherwise. It's irritating to me that they keep making drastic changes to feedback completely reformatting the standard. Why couldn't they seek more input in the first place before implementing a "guess and check" system with some obvious serious flaws. I definitely approve of eliminating the neuts from percentages and allowing buyers to edit feedback.



    My real question is, when is ebay going to have a feedback score where we can rate them? image Let's see what kind of DSRs they can keep!
  • They made the mistake of thinking they're invincible and the only alternative. They can't be unaware of the fact that grassroots competitors are popping up (not just for video games BTW) and their revenue is probably down from either projections, or even perhaps historic data.
  • Originally posted by: sosafan2


    My real question is, when is ebay going to have a feedback score where we can rate them? image Let's see what kind of DSRs they can keep!



    Thats what Im talking about!
  • Originally posted by: dangevin

    They made the mistake of thinking they're invincible and the only alternative. They can't be unaware of the fact that grassroots competitors are popping up (not just for video games BTW) and their revenue is probably down from either projections, or even perhaps historic data.

    Yeah, I'm basically done with ebay at this point.  I'll be selling exclusively on boards and grassroots sites, and buying only when boards and grassroots won't give me what I need.

    I wouldn't be surprised if eBay is no longer #1 for vintage games by the end of 2008.

  • Originally posted by: NESJohnny

    I wouldn't be surprised if eBay is no longer #1 for vintage games by the end of 2008.



    Hm..Maybe for the real collectors, those of us here who are more interested in dealing with each other to mutually complete sets. But eBay is full of unique, many times once-and-done buyers who simply aren't net savvy to find places like the newer auction sites, or other alternatives.

    I do think these new bid sites are great in the same way that the buy/sale/trade forums here are great...but I don't think they represent an access point to beginners or dilettantes. And it's such a huge portion of the market. I get a lot of moms buying my single carts. Way more female names than I've ever seen on the forums image
  • Without searching, I'd say that's the first time "dilettantes" has ever been uttered at NA.
  • Yah sorry about that guys image hehe
  • Revised feedback system is in place as of today. Neutrals are no longer weighted as negatives. Mine went back to 99.9%. Yeah!
  • 100% baby WOOT
  • Sweet! Back at 100% as well image !
  • Mine's now 99.1% hehe. Only have 226 feedback though image.
  • Oh yeah! Back to 100% baby!
  • oooh 99.9% up from 99.7% who cares
  • Wow, I never thought I'd see 100% next to my name again!
  • It's a great feeling, I know image
Sign In or Register to comment.