Parting out a collection - CIB vs C + IB
I don’t think I have seen this discussed, so I’m curious what you guys think. And if you have anything to back up your opinions.
Traditional wisdom says that in order to maximize your returns with a large lot, you need to sell the items either in small lots or one at a time. Yes it involves more work all around, but strictly speaking someone has to do the work, and the value someone is willing to spend on a lot for resale, somewhat correlates to the amount of work they have to do to get the return.
Does this also extend to parting out a CIB, and selling and listing it as cartridge only and IB only?
My thoughts are a bit skewed, but I am leaning towards it being driven on demand for the components. And in general, it is my opinion that there is higher demand / larger pool of buyers for a CIB, than finding buyers for cartridge only and IB only.
Happy to hear any input, and general discussions / first hand experience, etc.
Traditional wisdom says that in order to maximize your returns with a large lot, you need to sell the items either in small lots or one at a time. Yes it involves more work all around, but strictly speaking someone has to do the work, and the value someone is willing to spend on a lot for resale, somewhat correlates to the amount of work they have to do to get the return.
Does this also extend to parting out a CIB, and selling and listing it as cartridge only and IB only?
My thoughts are a bit skewed, but I am leaning towards it being driven on demand for the components. And in general, it is my opinion that there is higher demand / larger pool of buyers for a CIB, than finding buyers for cartridge only and IB only.
Happy to hear any input, and general discussions / first hand experience, etc.
Comments
Nearly every time, the answer is to keep it as a CIB to sell for more. There are exceptions.
Why do you think that is? Higher demand for a CIB over an IB, or something else?
I've seen box only auctions go for much more than I thought possible for some games, just cause people are trying to piece together a CIB. Hell, that's how I got my Mega Man 5 CIB (before I had to sell off). Guess it depends on condition, game, and time you're willing to put in.
Very interesting, I bet there is an element of rarity on certain games that plays into it.
You can always go the auction root and it will sell, but most times it will be at a discount. So if you have great games the cheaper you sell them the faster they will sell.
Even if there is a price benefit to separating it, it wouldn't be worth dealing with twice as many listings to me.
I do know that CB sucks to sell. Especially genesis.
I think a lot of cart only collectors would upgrade to cib if given the chance and IBs dont come up for sale that often. However i did all this to keep the carts (that i still own today) so it wasnt to max out the sale price. I dont think i wouldve netted more than just selling cib on my games. Maybe just on the super rare/desirable titles.
This is a case by case issue. You would have to do the math with each title.
I do know that CB sucks to sell. Especially genesis.
No doubt. I piece together Genesis stuff, but I pay more on purchasing stuff than I tend to receive on auctioning components.
But then the main question one needs to ask:
Is it worth the hassle of splitting up the components? In the majority of cases, the answer is likely to be a "no".
Nearly every time, the answer is to keep it as a CIB to sell for more. There are exceptions.
I've sold lots of boxes and manuals over the years as well as carts and CIBs. Agree CIB is usually worth more (even if the total price is a little less, splitting a CIB into three sales means three base commissions and three postage expenses. Not usually worth it.)
An instance where it is worth splitting is when, for example, you have a near-mint game and box, but a tattered manual. In those cases I've parted out the poor item (or if reversed, the mint item). I can't say for sure but I feel like the CIB would end up selling a bit below its "real" value due to one part of it being in poorer condition relatively speaking.